On 17.10.2022 10:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.10.2022 03:20, Henry Wang wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marma...@invisiblethingslab.com> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:33:12PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki >>> wrote: >>>> Re-use rmrr= parameter handling code to handle common device reserved >>>> memory. >>>> >>>> Move MAX_USER_RMRR_PAGES limit enforcement to apply only to >>>> user-configured ranges, but not those from internal callers. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki >>> <marma...@invisiblethingslab.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> >>> >>> Henry, can this be included in 4.17? The AMD counterpart went in >>> earlier, but due to late review on Intel part, this one didn't. >> >> Thanks for the information. I agree this is a valid reason, but to be >> safe I would like to hear opinions from the x86 maintainers (added >> in CC). >> >> Andrew/Jan/Roger: May I have your feedback about this? Thanks! > > Hmm, not sure what to say here. Yes, it would be nice for things to end > up consistent across vendors. And yes, the change here is largely > mechanical (afaics) and to code most of which shouldn't typically be in > use on systems anyway, and so should not pose an undue risk. But still > it is quite a bit of code churn ...
Was this lost, did you decide against allowing this in, or were you hoping for further responses by others? Jan
