This is a backport of my two recent series to fix bugs in SUPPORT.md, format it as part of the published docs, and use relative position of the `Status' stanza compared to descriptive text to indicate whether the text is a caveat that deserves a footnote.
Most of this is uncontroversial and I have run the build and checked that the resulting index.html is good. It would be good if someone could review particularly the way I resolved the conflicts in the big patch to SUPPORT.md, ie in [PATCH 8/9] SUPPORT.md: Move descriptions up before Status info The result for 4.10's SUPPORT.md is here: https://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/2018/support-matrix-example-C/SUPPORT.html I have also checked that (with the patch I am about to send for staging's parse-support-md) that this generates a sensible-looking support matrix. The resulting support matrix can be found here: https://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/2018/support-matrix-example-C/t.html (The hyperlink references for staging are to the live xenbits version; the references for 4.10 are to the example output file mentioned above.) I have squashed the fix to not depend on HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath into the patch that introduces the dependency. For my reference, this was made as follows: docs/support-matrix-generate -D HEAD https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable-staging/SUPPORT.html refs/heads/wip.support-stmt-NN-2 SUPPORT.html 2>&1 >docs/html/t.html |less rsync -LvP docs/html/{t,SUPPORT}.html xenbits:public_html/2018/support-matrix-example-C Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
