On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 8:58 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 06.12.2022 14:53, Jan Beulich wrote: > > While plausible to do what was intended based on the name of the flag > > (PGC_page_table), that name was misleading and is going to be changed. > > It marks page tables pages _having_ a shadow, not shadows of page table > > pages. The attempt also didn't cover the HAP case at all, and it > > constituted a potentially very long loop doing nothing when > > !SHADOW_PAGING. Instead leave a comment of what actually wants doing > > there (which then also may need to account for e.g. the risk of A/D bits > > becoming set behind our backs). > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <jandr...@gmail.com>
