On 12.12.2022 06:51, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 175147 linux-linus real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/175147/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-arm64-arm64-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-vhd 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-xl 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-xl 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-raw 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 173462
This was let go on for long enough that now Linux 6.1 was released with whatever regression still in place which is causing the above failures. I had put this on the agenda of the community call earlier this month, but sadly time didn't permit getting to this topic ... Jan
