Hi Juergen,
On 12/12/2022 12:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 01.12.22 22:34, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 01/11/2022 15:28, Juergen Gross wrote:
@@ -341,49 +339,56 @@ static bool get_domain_info(unsigned int domid,
xc_dominfo_t *dominfo)
dominfo->domid == domid;
}
-void check_domains(void)
+static int check_domain(void *k, void *v, void *arg)
Looking at this callback, shouldn't 'k' be const? If not, wouldn't
this mean a caller could potentially mess up with the hashtable?
I have modified the previous patch to make k const. I hope you are
fine with me having kept your "Reviewed-by:".
Yes I am fine with that.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
