On 13.12.2022 02:11, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 175154 xen-unstable real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/175154/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-i386-livepatch 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175144 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-pair 12 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-pair 13 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-coresched-amd64-xl 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-examine-uefi 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148
Looking at a random one of these failures I find (XEN) Assertion 'nid < MAX_NUMNODES && node_data[nid].node_spanned_pages' failed at ./include/xen/numa.h:76 which makes me wonder whether the NUMA generalization work was actually tested on a variety of x86 hardware. If a swift fix won't turn up, we'll need to figure out how much of your series needs reverting. Jan
