On 14.03.2023 02:50, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 9:32 AM >> >> If the scope for IGD's IOMMU contains additional device that doesn't >> actually exist, iommu=no-igfx would not disable that IOMMU. In this >> particular case (Thinkpad x230) it included >> 00:02.1, but there is no such device on this platform. >> Consider only existing devices for "gfx only" check. >> >> Fixes: 2d7f191b392e ("VT-d: generalize and correct "iommu=no-igfx" >> handling") >> Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki >> <[email protected]> > > this should be rebased on top of Jan's patch.
Right - I guess I could take care of that while applying. But I wonder whether the description wouldn't then want adjusting some as well. Or wait, with the v2 change it should actually have been adjusted already, as the igd_drhd_address determination is now (intentionally) also affected. Jan > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <[email protected]>
