On 30.03.2023 16:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:40:43PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 30.03.2023 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:53:23AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 29.03.2023 16:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> Patch 8 I'm unsure, I guess it should be up to the user to decide >>> whether to use -Os or some other optimization? >>> >>> I expect introspection users likely care way more about the speed >>> rather than the size of the generated x86 emulator code? >> >> Perhaps. But do we want to introduce another Kconfig control just >> for that? And wouldn't there likely be other performance concerns, >> if performance really mattered in the introspection case? > > I don't really have a strong opinion on the usage of -Os or not. It's > likely fine as long as we also stay consistent with the flag we use > when building the test harness and the fuzzer, just in case.
While they might be built with different compilers (and hence things can't be compared directly anyway), I can certainly make those two use -Os as well. Jan
