On 04/04/2023 3:54 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > These are close relatives of the AVX-VNNI ISA extension. Since the insns > here and in particular their memory access patterns follow the usual > scheme (and especially the byte variants of AVX-VNNI), I didn't think it > was necessary to add a contrived test specifically for them. > > While making the addition also re-wire AVX-VNNI's handling to > simd_0f_ymm: There's no reason to check the AVX feature alongside the > one actually of interest (there are a few features where two checks are > actually necessary, e.g. GFNI+AVX, but this isn't the case here). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
