On 20.04.2023 13:25, Henry Wang wrote: > From: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com> > > NUMA has one global and one implementation specific switches. For > ACPI NUMA implementation, Xen has acpi_numa, so we introduce > device_tree_numa for device tree NUMA implementation. And use > enumerations to indicate init, off and on status. > > arch_numa_disabled will get device_tree_numa status, but for > arch_numa_setup we have not provided boot arguments to setup > device_tree_numa. So we just return -EINVAL in this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <henry.w...@arm.com> > --- > v2 -> v3: > 1. Rename the first entry of enum dt_numa_status as DT_NUMA_DEFAULT. > 2. Make enum dt_numa_status device_tree_numa as __ro_after_init and > assign it explicitly to DT_NUMA_DEFAULT. > 3. Update the year in copyright to 2023. > 4. Don't move the x86 numa_disabled() and make Arm's numa_disabled() > a static inline function for !CONFIG_NUMA. > v1 -> v2: > 1. Use arch_numa_disabled to replace numa_enable_with_firmware. > 2. Introduce enumerations for device tree numa status. > 3. Use common numa_disabled, drop Arm version numa_disabled. > 4. Introduce arch_numa_setup for Arm. > 5. Rename bad_srat to numa_bad. > 6. Add numa_enable_with_firmware helper. > 7. Add numa_disabled helper. > 8. Refine commit message. > --- > xen/arch/arm/include/asm/numa.h | 17 +++++++++++ > xen/arch/arm/numa.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/numa.c
While I was Cc-ed on this one, neither the diffstat nor any possible remarks make clear whether anything is expected of me here. Jan
