On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 09:12 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 06.06.2023 21:55, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com> > > This wants addressing the "Why?" aspect in the description. Is the > present > code wrong in some perhaps subtle way? Are you meaning to re-use the > code? > If so, in which way (which is relevant to determine whether the new > function may actually continue to live in .text.header)? > As I mentioned in previous e-mail there is no such requirement for reset_stack() function to live in .text.header.
I think such requirement exists only for _start() function as we would like to see it at the start of image as a bootloader jumps to it and it is expected to be the first instructions. Even though I don't see any issue for reset_stack() to live in .text.header section, should it be moved to .text section? If yes, I would appreciate hearing why it would be better. ~ Oleksii
