Hi Stewart,
Stewart Hildebrand <[email protected]> writes: > On 6/13/23 06:32, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is another another version of vPCI rework (previous one can be >> found at [1]). The biggest change is how vPCI locking is done. This >> series uses per-domain vPCI rwlock. >> >> Note that this series does not include my work on reference counting >> for PCI devices because this counting does not resolve isses we are >> having for vPCI. While it is (maybe) nice to have PCI refcounting, it >> does not moves us towards PCI on ARM. >> >> >> [1] >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/__;!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!0BUqPos1zFKUoPwbKLLwKItNgBVPaBgxmH1Y6zXpms2bngrlWrzB-qMNvIaiAy2WSWMa93UrlvRi0ijYP8X4Ymx07GXYPO1W$ >> [lore[.]kernel[.]org] > > Thanks for sending this! > > Should this be v8? I see v7 at [2]. Oops, my bad. > I had to rewind my xen.git back to 67c28bfc5245 for this series to apply > cleanly (just before ee045f3a4a6d "vpci/header: cope with devices not having > vpci allocated"). I rebased this series onto staging about two weeks ago. Looks like there was new changes into the PCI code after that. Should I send a new, real v8 which is rebased onto current staging, or we'll wait for review for the current set of patches? -- WBR, Volodymyr
