Hi Juergen,
On 24/07/2023 12:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
For an effective way to replace a hashtable entry add a new function
hashtable_replace().
This is in preparation to replace TDB with a more simple data storage.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
---
V3:
- fix commit message (Julien Grall)
- move unrelated change to previous patch (Julien Grall)
- make value parameter const
---
tools/xenstore/hashtable.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/xenstore/hashtable.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/xenstore/hashtable.c b/tools/xenstore/hashtable.c
index 0409725060..f85b5a71f1 100644
--- a/tools/xenstore/hashtable.c
+++ b/tools/xenstore/hashtable.c
@@ -205,6 +205,25 @@ void *hashtable_search(const struct hashtable *h, const
void *k)
return e ? e->v : NULL;
}
+int hashtable_replace(struct hashtable *h, const void *k, const void *v)
With the const dropped for 'v' and ...
+{
+ struct entry *e;
+
+ e = hashtable_search_entry(h, k);
+ if (!e)
+ return ENOENT;
+
+ if (h->flags & HASHTABLE_FREE_VALUE)
+ {
+ talloc_free(e->v);
+ talloc_steal(e, v);
+ }
+
+ e->v = (void *)v;
... cast:
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall