Hi,
On 24/07/2023 12:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add a variant of get_node() returning a const struct node pointer.
Note that all callers of this new variant don't supply a pointer where
to store the canonical node name, while all callers needing a non-const
node do supply this pointer. This results in an asymmetric
simplification of the two variants.
And I am guessing there are no near term plan to use get_node() with
canonical_name = NULL or the caller of get_node_const() expecting the name?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall