On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 18:43 +0200, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:30 PM Oleksii Kurochko > <oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com> > > --- > > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/vm_event.h | 52 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/vm_event.h > > I don't think we ought to replicate this header for every arch when > clearly the functions in them are only relevant for specific > architectures. Would make more sense to me to just conditionalize the > caller side to the specific archs where these functions are actually > defined, which would largely just be CONFIG_X86.
Thanks. I'll take it into account. ~ Oleksii
