On 12.09.2023 10:33, Jan Beulich wrote: > And note how I offered a compromise by someone (Simon, you, Roger, or yet > someone else) sending a patch against SUPPORT.md. Yet that hasn't happened. > I therefore continue to be of the opinion that I can rightfully revert the > patch, based on process not having been followed and alternative actions > not having been taken.
Hmm, I now see that Stefano has actually sent such a patch, just not on a fresh thread. With that acked and committed, the primary reason to revert will disappear. I'll mention the other aspect in a reply to Simon. Jan
