On 14/10/2023 00:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Federico Serafini wrote:
Add missing parameter names, no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.seraf...@bugseng.com>
---
  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h 
b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 8011076b8c..41e97c23dd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -127,8 +127,8 @@ static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num)
  struct arm_cpu_capabilities {
      const char *desc;
      u16 capability;
-    bool (*matches)(const struct arm_cpu_capabilities *);
-    int (*enable)(void *); /* Called on every active CPUs */
+    bool (*matches)(const struct arm_cpu_capabilities *caps);

all the implementations of matches I found in xen/arch/arm/cpuerrata.c
actually call the parameter "entry"


+    int (*enable)(void *ptr); /* Called on every active CPUs */

this one instead is "data"

I committed all the other patches in this series to the my for-4.19 branch

I have left some comments in patch #1. Given this is not the latest master, I think we should consider to remove/replace the patch rather than introducing a follow-up.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

Reply via email to