On 02.10.2023 17:11, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Since it was indicated that introducing specific new vCPU ops may be > beneficial independent of the introduction of a fully physical- > address-based ABI flavor, here we go. There continue to be a few open > questions throughout the series, resolving of which was one of the main > goals of the earlier postings. > > v5 adds one vm-fork specific pre-patch that does simply the introduced > code later on. It does also fix a vm-fork bug. > > Patches 1 and 6 are missing and Ack from the mem-sharing maintainer. > > Whole series will need a Release-Ack. > > Thanks, Roger. > > Jan Beulich (9): > x86/shim: zap runstate and time area handles during shutdown > domain: GADDR based shared guest area registration alternative - > teardown > domain: update GADDR based runstate guest area > x86: update GADDR based secondary time area > x86/mem-sharing: copy GADDR based shared guest areas > domain: map/unmap GADDR based shared guest areas > domain: introduce GADDR based runstate area registration alternative > x86: introduce GADDR based secondary time area registration > alternative > common: convert vCPU info area registration > > Roger Pau Monne (1): > mem_sharing/fork: do not attempt to populate vcpu_info page
Thanks much for picking this up during my absence. Jan
