>>> On 30.05.18 at 12:04, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/05/18 09:55, Jan Beulich wrote: >> While the involved code (in pv_domain_initialise()) sits behind an >> !is_idle_domain() check already, we need to add one here. > > I'm afraid that I struggled to understand what you meant here. AFACIT, > you mean that the backport over the introduction of > pv_domain_initialise() neglected to account for the fact that the idle > domain also wanders this path in 4.9 and earlier?
Oh, I see I've omitted "in 4.10" ahead of the comma. >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > > Either way, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
