Hi,
On 05/12/2023 13:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.12.2023 14:46, Julien Grall wrote:
On 05/12/2023 13:41, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 05.12.23 14:31, Julien Grall wrote:
Anyway, given you don't seem to have a use-case yet, I would simply to
consider to surround the declaration with an a config which can be
selected if unaligned access is supported.
Like in xen/common/lzo.c et al?
Just to clarify, I am suggesting to add in unaligned.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
your definitions
#endif
But that would be wrong: HAS_UNALIGNED_ACCESS would be there to indicate
one does _not_ need any special accessors.
I am guessing you are disagreeing on the name rather than the concept?
If so, what about CONFIG_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_ALLOWED?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
