On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 09:22 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 21.12.2023 20:09, Julien Grall wrote: > > On 20/12/2023 14:08, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > > <asm/numa.h> is common through some archs so it is moved > > > to asm-generic. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <[email protected]> > > > Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Shawn Anastasio <[email protected]> > > > > I think this patch will need to be rebased on top of the lastest > > staging > > as this should clash with 51ffb3311895. > > No, and I'd like to withdraw my ack here. In this case a stub header > isn't > the right choice imo - the !NUMA case should be handled in common > code. I > would have submitted the patch I have, if only the first_valid_mfn > patch > hadn't been committed already (which I now need to re-base over). I haven't seen your patch yet (waiting for it), but I assume that <asm/numa.h> will still be necessary and remain the same across Arm, PPC, and RISC-V.
What am I missing? ~ Oleksii
