On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 12:17:29PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.02.2024 18:01, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > IVMD and RMRR ranges are functionally equivalent, and as so could use the > > same > > validity checker. > > May I suggest s/equivalent/similar/?
Sure. > > Move the IVMD to x86 common IOMMU code and adjust the function to take a > > pair > > of [start, end) mfn parameters. > > [start,end) ranges generally come with the problem of not allowing to > represent the full address space. While that isn't specifically a problem > here, seeing that both VT-d and V-i present inclusive ranges, how about > making the common function match that? OK, I can adjust the code that way. I originally did it using non inclusive because it looked like the code would be clearer. Thanks, Roger.
