On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:56:55PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > ..., thus allowing it to become static, and thus reducing scope overlap > between it and pci_ats_device(). There's nothing x86-specific about this > function anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné [email protected]> FWIW, the function would better return a boolean, as none of the callers care about the position of the ATS capability, and use it as an indication that ATS is supported. Thanks, Roger.
