On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:31 PM Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> The test code has a typo in using LIVEPATCH_APPLY_HOOK() instead of
> LIVEPATCH_REVERT_HOOK().
>
> Fixes: 6047104c3ccc ('livepatch: Add per-function applied/reverted state 
> tracking marker')
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
> ---
>  xen/test/livepatch/xen_action_hooks_norevert.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/test/livepatch/xen_action_hooks_norevert.c 
> b/xen/test/livepatch/xen_action_hooks_norevert.c
> index 074f8e1d56ce..cdfff156cede 100644
> --- a/xen/test/livepatch/xen_action_hooks_norevert.c
> +++ b/xen/test/livepatch/xen_action_hooks_norevert.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void post_revert_hook(livepatch_payload_t *payload)
>      printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Hook done.\n", __func__);
>  }
>
> -LIVEPATCH_APPLY_HOOK(revert_hook);
> +LIVEPATCH_REVERT_HOOK(revert_hook);
>
>  LIVEPATCH_PREAPPLY_HOOK(pre_apply_hook);
>  LIVEPATCH_POSTAPPLY_HOOK(post_apply_hook);
> --

Reviewed-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerw...@citrix.com>

Reply via email to