On 11.03.2024 13:07, Simone Ballarin wrote:
> On 11/03/24 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.03.2024 09:59, Simone Ballarin wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
>>>    * is intended to be included by common/efi/boot.c _only_, and
>>>    * therefore can define arch specific global variables.
>>>    */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef XEN_ARCH_ARM_EFI_EFI_BOOT_H
>>> +#define XEN_ARCH_ARM_EFI_EFI_BOOT_H
>>
>> Related to my question raised against the cover letter, what does the
>> XEN_ prefix gain us here? All building of the hypervisor binaries
>> happens inside the xen/ subtree.
> 
> what do you thing about adding this rule:
> arch/<arch>/<subdir>/<filename> -> <ARCH>_<subdir>_<filename>_H
> ?

Yet better - even the ARCH_ is gone then. Of course we want to then be
reasonably sure no arch appears with a name matching some of the other
top-level (under xen/) subdirs.

Jan

Reply via email to