On 18.04.2024 17:00, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2024-04-18 09:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.04.2024 16:51, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/toolchain.ecl
>>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/toolchain.ecl
>>> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
>>> -doc_end
>>>
>>> -doc_begin="See Section \"6.19 Structures with No Members\" of
>>> "GCC_MANUAL"."
>>> --config=STD.emptrecd,behavior+={c99,GCC_ARM64,specified}
>>> --config=STD.emptrecd,behavior+={c99,GCC_X86_64,specified}
>>> +-config=STD.anonstct,behavior+={c99,GCC_ARM64,specified}
>>> +-config=STD.anonstct,behavior+={c99,GCC_X86_64,specified}
>>> -doc_end
>>
>> I'm irritated by this, which may be in part because of too terse a
>> description.
>> "emptrecd" looks like an abbreviation of "empty record" to me, in line
>> with
>> "Structures with No Members". "anonstct" otoh looks an abbreviation of
>> "anonymous structures" to me, which is something different (structures
>> without
>> names).
>
> I'm afraid I can't do much about this. From a functionality standpoint
> there is no difference for Xen.
What I'm pretty sure you can do is provide a patch description that
allows readers to understand anything seemingly (or actually) anomalous.
Jan
