On 24.04.2024 09:37, Federico Serafini wrote:
> On 23/04/24 18:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.04.2024 17:52, Federico Serafini wrote:
>>> On 23/04/24 12:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 23.04.2024 12:02, Federico Serafini wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + * - R16.4
>>>>> + - A switch statement with a single switch clause and no default
>>>>> label may
>>>>> + be used in place of an equivalent if statement if it is
>>>>> considered to
>>>>> + improve readability."
>>
>> No, I don't think there should be examples in those documents. But those
>> documents should also not (blindly) rely on terminology in the Misra
>> spec, as not everyone has access to that (licensed copies had to be
>> obtained for quite a few of us).
>
> In deviations.rst there is an identical deviation for Rule 16.6
> ("Every switch statement shall have at least two switch-clauses").
> I think we should remain consistent.
Sure, I'm all for consistency. Yet given the term "switch clause" doesn't
appear in the C standard (afaics), it wants defining somewhere.
Jan
