On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 09:11 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 03.05.2024 18:54, Oleksii wrote:
> > *** x86 ***:
> >   * [PATCH 0/4] iommu/x86: fixes/improvements for unity range
> > checks [
> > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20240201170159.66330-1-roger....@citrix.com/
> > ]:
> >     - almost patch series have been merged already except the
> > patch:
> >         [PATCH 4/4] iommu/x86: make unity range checking more
> > strict
> > 
> >   * [PATCH 0/8] x86: support AVX10.1 [
> > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/298db76f-d0ee-4d47-931f-1baa1a754...@suse.com/
> > ]:
> >     - two patches of patch series are waitng to merged/reviewed:
> >       [PATCH 1/4] amd-vi: fix IVMD memory type checks
> >       [PATCH 4/4] iommu/x86: make unity range checking more strict 
> 
> This sub-item doesn't really fit the topic, and seems to rather
> belong
> to the earlier one? 
Thanks for correction, it is belonged to previous topic.

> Where (correctly) 1/4 isn't listed anymore, for
> having gone in. As to 4/4 - Roger, I'm not sure I can conclude what
> the
> plan here was: Are you meaning to submit an updated version, or did
> we
> rather settle on not further pursuing this?
> 
> >   * APX support?
> 
> I think you should drop this now. I'm throttling further work on the
> insn
> emulator, as long as I have so many other patches there pending
> review.
> 
> >   * [PATCH v6 0/4] x86/pvh: Support relocating dom0 kernel [
> > https://patchew.org/Xen/20240327215102.136001-1-jason.andr...@amd.com/
> > ]
> 
> There had been a v7, and all of that plus a follow-on adjustment have
> gone
> in.
> 
> > *** common ***:
> >   * annotate entry points with type and size" series:
> >     The bulk of this has gone in, but there'll want to be follow-
> > ups.
> 
> I think these follow-ups now want tracking on a per-arch basis (x86
> and
> Arm, with PPC and RISC-V filly done).
> 
> >   * [PATCH v2 (resend) 00/27] Remove the directmap [
> > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20240116192611.41112-1-elias...@amazon.com/
> > ]
> >     - 7/27 were merged.
> 
> Hmm, no, I don't think that one was. Other were, yes.
> 
> >   * [PATCH v6 0/7] MSI-X support with qemu in stubdomain, and other
> > related changes:
> >     - new patch version was sent
> 
> 1/7 was committed.
> 
> >   * [PATCH v3 0/4] xenwatchdogd bugfixes and enhancements [
> > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20240411182023.56309-1-le...@solinno.co.uk/
> > ]:
> >     new patch series were sent.
> 
> Was there anything left from that series?
I double-checked and everything has been merged. Thanks for correction.

I'm considering writing a script to automate the process of checking
whether the patches in a patch series have been merged or not.
Currently, I'm doing it manually, so there's a chance I might miss
something. It would be helpful if such a script already exists.

~ Oleksii

Reply via email to