On 30.04.2024 14:47, Fouad Hilly wrote:
> @@ -21,10 +23,11 @@ static const char amd_id[] = "AuthenticAMD";
> static void usage(const char *name)
> {
> printf("%s: Xen microcode updating tool\n"
> - "Usage: %s [<microcode file> | Options]\n"
> + "Usage: %s [microcode file] [options]\n"
> "options:\n"
> " -h, --help display this help and exit\n"
> - " -s, --show-cpu-info show CPU information and exit\n",
> + " -s, --show-cpu-info show CPU information and exit\n"
> + " -f, --force force to skip micorocde version check\n",
Besides (nit) the typo, isn't "version check" too broad here? Elsewhere in the
series you mention Intel's "min_rev" addition. _That_ kind of version check
probably shouldn't be permitted to skip? In which case maybe better "certain
version checking" or some such?
Jan
