On 07/06/2024 11:03 am, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > PVH dom0 is functionally very similar to PVH domU except for the domain > builder and the added set of hypercalls available to it. > > The main concern with declaring it "Supported" is the lack of some features > when compared to classic PV dom0, hence switch it's status to supported with > caveats. List the known missing features, there might be more features > missing > or not working as expected apart from the ones listed. > > Note there's some (limited) PVH dom0 testing on both osstest and gitlab. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> > --- > Hopefully this will attract more testing an resources to PVH dom0 in order to > try to finish the missing features.
As agreed in the XenSummit session on the topic. Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
