On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Coverity complains about it being invalid. It turns out that it is a GCC-ism > to treat ll and L equivalently. C99 only permits L to mean long double. > > Convert all uses of L in to alternatives, either l, ll or PRI.64 depending on > the operand type. This in turn removes some unnecessary casts which look to > predate us having correct PRI* constants. > > No functional change. > > Coverity-IDs: 1464224, 1464228, 1464248, 1464261, 1464272, 1464281, 1464287, > 1464290, 1494437 > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
