On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 13:18 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 02.08.2024 13:02, oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com wrote: > > There is something what we need is mentioned here: > > https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-asm-manual/blob/main/riscv-asm.md#instruction-aliases > > But the problem is that is "de-facto" standard, but not really > > standard > > instruction. Anyway, I will update the patch to use (C0001073) > > instead > > of ebreak. > > Well, the official spec, in the C extension, mentions 0x0000 as > "defined > illegal instruction". Wouldn't using that work? It's going to be > undefined > no matter whether the C extension is actually implemented. It should work. I will use 0x0000 then. Thanks.
~ Oleksii
