On 10.09.2024 12:09, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3:
> "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate every
> switch-clause".

Since in our interpretation "return" is okay too, why is not sufficient to
simply ...

> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
> @@ -170,8 +170,10 @@ static int __init cf_check parse_phantom_dev(const char 
> *str)
>      {
>      case 1: case 2: case 4:
>          if ( *s )
> -    default:
>              return -EINVAL;
> +        break;

... insert just this one line here?

Jan

> +    default:
> +        return -EINVAL;
>      }
>  
>      phantom_devs[nr_phantom_devs++] = phantom;


Reply via email to