On 10.09.2024 12:09, Federico Serafini wrote: > Address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3: > "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate every > switch-clause".
Since in our interpretation "return" is okay too, why is not sufficient to simply ... > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c > @@ -170,8 +170,10 @@ static int __init cf_check parse_phantom_dev(const char > *str) > { > case 1: case 2: case 4: > if ( *s ) > - default: > return -EINVAL; > + break; ... insert just this one line here? Jan > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > } > > phantom_devs[nr_phantom_devs++] = phantom;