On 12.03.25 17:46, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 09:41:43AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:diff --git a/docs/misc/xenstore.txt b/docs/misc/xenstore.txt index 7e1f031520..72db73deef 100644 --- a/docs/misc/xenstore.txt +++ b/docs/misc/xenstore.txt @@ -86,6 +86,67 @@ parts of xenstore inaccessible to some clients. In any case passing +XS_CONTROL 0 optional + If not supported, xenstore-control command will not work. + XS_DEBUG is a deprecated alias of XS_CONTROL. +XS_DIRECTORY 1 +XS_READ 2 +XS_GET_PERMS 3This new table prefix message type names with "XS_", but the rest of the document describe each type without the prefix. Isn't it going to be confusing, and make it slightly harder to link this table to rest of the document? (I often search by full word, like '\<GET_PERMS\>', because that one key stroke in vim '*', so having different prefix makes it harder to search)
Question is, should I change the table to drop "XS_", or the rest document to add "XS_" instead? After all xs_wire.h is defining the names with "XS_". I'm slightly leaning towards a preparatory patch adding "XS_". Juergen
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
