On 4/16/25 09:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.04.2025 15:42, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
On 4/10/25 08:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.04.2025 18:07, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>
Introduce the `cpus` property, named as such for dom0less compatibility, that
represents the maximum number of vpcus to allocate for a domain. In the device
Nit: vcpus
I agree with you here, the issue is that it was requested that we keep
this field in line with Arm's DT, and they unfortunately used `cpus` to
specify the vcpu allocation.
You misunderstood, I think. The comment was on the mis-spelling in the latter
of the quoted lines.
Then your latter comment is that you want the internal field to be
renamed to cpu? Wouldn't that create further confusion of a physical cpu
assignment vs virtual cpu allocation?
v/r,
dps
