On 16/04/2025 2:44 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> For the X86EMUL_EXCEPTION case the repeat count must be correctly
> propagated back. Since for the recursive invocation we use a local
> helper variable, its value needs copying to the caller's one.
>
> While there also correct the off-by-1 range in the comment ahead of the
> function (strictly speaking for the "DF set" case we'd need to put
> another, different range there as well).
>
> Fixes: 53f87c03b4ea ("x86emul: generalize exception handling for rep_* hooks")
> Reported-by: Manuel Andreas <manuel.andr...@tum.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> I really do hate everything about how *reps is handled in the emulator, but this will have to do in the short term.
