On Wed, 21 May 2025, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 21.05.2025 16:35, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > > I think we should aim to share binding code wherever possible, using common > > datastructures (kernel_info and bootmodule) as dumping ground for the > > results > > of the binding parsing functions. I seek agreement on the following 3 points > > for the end goal of DTB multidomain boots on x86 before I start slicing > > my hacks into reasonable chunks. > > > > 1. We want common data structures, with arch-specific fields to hold > > information from xen,domain DT nodes > > 2. We want to have a single collection of DTB parsers in the code. > > 3. We want to operate on the unflattened DTB for the majority of parsing. > > (plus a minimal version on the FDT in order to bootstrap, also common) > > +1 on all three, with the caveat that I'm far from being an expert on DT.
+1 from me as well
