On 2025/8/5 23:05, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
>> The generic entry code expects architecture code to provide
>> regs_irqs_disabled(regs) function, but arm64 does not have this and
>> provides inerrupts_enabled(regs), which has the opposite polarity.
> Nit: "interrupts_enabled(regs)"

Good catch! thank you for the review.

>> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
>> relace arm64's interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() and
>> update its callers under arch/arm64.
>>
>> For the moment, a definition of interrupts_enabled() is provided for
>> the GICv3 driver. Once arch/arm implement regs_irqs_disabled(), this
>> can be removed.
>>
>> Delete the fast_interrupts_enabled() macro as it is unused and we
>> don't want any new users to show up.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjin...@huawei.com>
>> ---
> Otherwise looks good to me !
> Reviewed-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupried...@arm.com>
> 

Reply via email to