On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:39:42AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 09.08.2025 20:37, dm...@proton.me wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 12:53:36PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 31.07.2025 21:22, dm...@proton.me wrote: > >>> --- a/xen/common/emul/vuart/Makefile > >>> +++ b/xen/common/emul/vuart/Makefile > >>> @@ -1 +1,2 @@ > >>> obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_VUART) += vuart.o > >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VUART_NS16550) += vuart-ns16550.o > >> > >> I don't think files in this directory need a vuart- name prefix. > > > > Ack. > > > > Hmm, there's already ns16550.c which is UART driver, so it may be confusing > > to > > have two ns16550s (although in different directories). > > > > I do not have a strong preference on the naming here. > > We have several examples of files with the same name in distinct directories. > As an aside - is it really only 16550-s that you emulate? Otherwise the name > may want to be e.g. ns16x50.c or ns8250.c.
I'll use ns16x50.c. > > Jan
