Hi Andrew,
On 18/08/2025 09:18, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This was almost certainly copy&paste from x86. ARM does not us these nor
selects HAS_EX_TABLE, so drop the sections and their boundary markers.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
Cheers,
---
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>
CC: Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>
CC: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>
CC: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marq...@arm.com>
CC: Michal Orzel <michal.or...@amd.com>
Found because I'm getting rid of .ex_table.pre on x86 too.
---
xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
index 9f30c3a13ed1..db17ff1efa98 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
@@ -86,16 +86,6 @@ SECTIONS
} : text
.data.read_mostly : {
- /* Exception table */
- __start___ex_table = .;
- *(.ex_table)
- __stop___ex_table = .;
-
- /* Pre-exception table */
- __start___pre_ex_table = .;
- *(.ex_table.pre)
- __stop___pre_ex_table = .;
-
*(.data.read_mostly)
} :text
--
Julien Grall
