On 21.08.2025 16:13, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 wrote: > On 8/21/25 12:18, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 20.08.2025 09:17, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 wrote: >>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/monitored.ecl >>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/monitored.ecl >>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ >>> -enable=MC3A2.R10.2 >>> -enable=MC3A2.R11.1 >>> -enable=MC3A2.R11.2 >>> +-enable=MC3A2.R11.3 >> >> While the description mentions this change, it doesn't say why (e.g. "no >> violations left" or "only this and that violation left" or some such). > ARM: 813V -> 16V > X86: 1422V -> 1035V > > Looks OK for ARM (to be added in the monitoring list), but X86... > Anyway the number of reported errors has no side effect.
Does it not, i.e. not even on the time it takes Eclair to do a full run? > Jan, decision up to you (include into monitored.ecl or not). For x86 I think the count is still too high. And no, it's not solely my decision. Jan
