Hi Leonid,
On 07/08/2025 13:33, Leonid Komarianskyi wrote:
Currently, many common functions perform the same operations to calculate
GIC register addresses. This patch consolidates the similar code into
a separate helper function to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
This refactoring also simplifies the implementation of eSPI support in future
changes.
Signed-off-by: Leonid Komarianskyi <leonid_komarians...@epam.com>
---
Changes in V2:
- no changes
I am a bit surprised this is just saying no changes given the discussion
in v1. I feel you should have pinged on the v1 to close off the
discussion before sending v2.
While I understand your point and could accept we consolidate the code...
---
xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
index cd3e1acf79..8fd78aba44 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
@@ -445,17 +445,62 @@ static void gicv3_dump_state(const struct vcpu *v)
}
}
+static void __iomem *get_addr_by_offset(struct irq_desc *irqd, u32 offset)
+{
+ switch ( irqd->irq )
+ {
+ case 0 ... (NR_GIC_LOCAL_IRQS - 1):
+ switch ( offset )
+ {
+ case GICD_ISENABLER:
+ case GICD_ICENABLER:
+ case GICD_ISPENDR:
+ case GICD_ICPENDR:
+ case GICD_ISACTIVER:
+ case GICD_ICACTIVER:
+ return (GICD_RDIST_SGI_BASE + offset);
+ case GICD_ICFGR:
+ return (GICD_RDIST_SGI_BASE + GICR_ICFGR1);
+ case GICD_IPRIORITYR:
+ return (GICD_RDIST_SGI_BASE + GICR_IPRIORITYR0 + irqd->irq);
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ case NR_GIC_LOCAL_IRQS ... SPI_MAX_INTID:
+ switch ( offset )
+ {
+ case GICD_ISENABLER:
+ case GICD_ICENABLER:
+ case GICD_ISPENDR:
+ case GICD_ICPENDR:
+ case GICD_ISACTIVER:
+ case GICD_ICACTIVER:
+ return (GICD + offset + (irqd->irq / 32) * 4);
+ case GICD_ICFGR:
+ return (GICD + GICD_ICFGR + (irqd->irq / 16) * 4);
+ case GICD_IROUTER:
+ return (GICD + GICD_IROUTER + irqd->irq * 8);
+ case GICD_IPRIORITYR:
+ return (GICD + GICD_IPRIORITYR + irqd->irq);
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Something went wrong, we shouldn't be able to reach here */
> + panic("Invalid offset 0x%x for IRQ#%d", offset, irqd->irq);
... I still quite concerned about using panic here. We need to try to
handle the error more gracefully in production.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
