On 26.08.25 18:28, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> writes:
We want to make use of "pgtable_level" for an enum in core-mm. Other
architectures seem to call "struct pgtable_level" either:
* "struct pg_level" when not exposed in a header (riscv, arm)
* "struct ptdump_pg_level" when expose in a header (arm64)
So let's follow what arm64 does.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/8xx.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/book3s64.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/ptdump.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/shared.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
As mentioned in commit msg mostly a mechanical change to convert
"struct pgtable_level" to "struct ptdump_pg_level" for aforementioned purpose..
The patch looks ok and compiles fine on my book3s64 and ppc32 platform.
I think we should fix the subject line.. s/ptdump_pglevel/ptdump_pg_level
Ahh, yes thanks.
@Andrew, can you fix that up?
Otherwise the changes looks good to me. So please feel free to add -
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.l...@gmail.com>
Thanks!
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
