On 28.08.2025 12:06, Penny Zheng wrote:
> @@ -154,6 +156,17 @@ static int get_cpufreq_para(struct xen_sysctl_pm_op *op)
>      else
>          strlcpy(op->u.get_para.scaling_driver, "Unknown", CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
>  
> +    /*
> +     * In CPPC active mode, we are borrowing governor field to indicate
> +     * policy info.
> +     */
> +    if ( policy->governor->name[0] )
> +        strlcpy(op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_governor,
> +                policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
> +    else
> +        strlcpy(op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_governor, "Unknown",
> +                CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);

Isn't pulling this ...

>      if ( !cpufreq_is_governorless(op->cpuid) )
>      {
>          if ( !(scaling_available_governors =

... out of this if()'s body going to affect HWP? It's not clear to me whether
that would be entirely benign.

Jan

Reply via email to