On Wed, 10 Sep 2025, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 10.09.2025 09:38, Penny Zheng wrote: > > Function xsm_vm_event_control() is only invoked under CONFIG_VM_EVENT, so > > it shall be wrapped with it > > Isn't this addressing a Misra violation then? Whether it's "unreachable code" > or "dead code" I can't really tell; I don't think I have properly understood > when it is which of the two. (Change looks okay to me, apart from this aspect > of describing it.)
It would be "unreachable code". So yes, this patch helps address Rule 2.1.
