Hi Oleksandr,

On 03.12.25 13:03, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:


On 02.12.25 23:33, Grygorii Strashko wrote:


Hello Grygorii



On 02.12.25 21:32, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
Creating a guest with a high vCPU count (e.g., >32) fails because
the guest's device tree buffer (DOMU_DTB_SIZE) overflows during creation.
The FDT nodes for each vCPU quickly exhaust the 4KiB buffer,
causing a guest creation failure.

Increase the buffer size to 16KiB to support guests up to
the MAX_VIRT_CPUS limit (128).

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <[email protected]>
---
Noticed when testing the boundary conditions for dom0less guest
creation on Arm64.

Domain configuration:
fdt mknod /chosen domU0
fdt set /chosen/domU0 compatible "xen,domain"
fdt set /chosen/domU0 \#address-cells <0x2>
fdt set /chosen/domU0 \#size-cells <0x2>
fdt set /chosen/domU0 memory <0x0 0x10000 >
fdt set /chosen/domU0 cpus <33>
fdt set /chosen/domU0 vpl011
fdt mknod /chosen/domU0 module@40400000
fdt set /chosen/domU0/module@40400000 compatible  "multiboot,kernel"
"multiboot,module"
fdt set /chosen/domU0/module@40400000 reg <0x0 0x40400000 0x0 0x16000 >
fdt set /chosen/domU0/module@40400000 bootargs "console=ttyAMA0"

Failure log:
(XEN) Xen dom0less mode detected
(XEN) *** LOADING DOMU cpus=33 memory=0x10000KB ***
(XEN) Loading d1 kernel from boot module @ 0000000040400000
(XEN) Allocating mappings totalling 64MB for d1:
(XEN) d1 BANK[0] 0x00000040000000-0x00000044000000 (64MB)
(XEN) Device tree generation failed (-22).
(XEN)
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
(XEN) Could not set up domain domU0 (rc = -22)
(XEN) ****************************************
---
---
   xen/common/device-tree/dom0less-build.c | 8 +++++---
   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/device-tree/dom0less-build.c b/xen/common/
device-tree/dom0less-build.c
index 3f5b987ed8..d7d0a47b97 100644
--- a/xen/common/device-tree/dom0less-build.c
+++ b/xen/common/device-tree/dom0less-build.c
@@ -461,10 +461,12 @@ static int __init
domain_handle_dtb_boot_module(struct domain *d,
   /*
    * The max size for DT is 2MB. However, the generated DT is small
(not including
- * domU passthrough DT nodes whose size we account separately), 4KB
are enough
- * for now, but we might have to increase it in the future.
+ * domU passthrough DT nodes whose size we account separately). The
size is
+ * primarily driven by the number of vCPU nodes. The previous 4KiB
buffer was
+ * insufficient for guests with high vCPU counts, so it has been
increased
+ * to support up to the MAX_VIRT_CPUS limit (128).
    */
-#define DOMU_DTB_SIZE 4096
+#define DOMU_DTB_SIZE (4096 * 4)

May be It wants Kconfig?
Or some formula which accounts MAX_VIRT_CPUS?


I agree that using a formula that accounts for MAX_VIRT_CPUS is the most
robust approach.

Here is the empirical data (by testing with the maximum number of device
tree nodes (e.g., hypervisor and reserved-memory nodes) and enabling all
optional CPU properties (e.g., clock-frequency)):

cpus=1
(XEN) Final compacted FDT size is: 1586 bytes

cpus=2
(XEN) Final compacted FDT size is: 1698 bytes

cpus=32
(XEN) Final compacted FDT size is: 5058 bytes

cpus=128
(XEN) Final compacted FDT size is: 15810 bytes


static int __init prepare_dtb_domU(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info
*kinfo)
   {
       int addrcells, sizecells;
@@ -569,6 +569,8 @@ static int __init prepare_dtb_domU(struct domain *d,
struct kernel_info *kinfo)
       if ( ret < 0 )
           goto err;

+    printk("Final compacted FDT size is: %d bytes\n",
fdt_totalsize(kinfo->fdt));
+
       return 0;

     err:

This data shows (assuming my testing/calculations are correct):

- A marginal cost of 112 bytes per vCPU in the final, compacted device tree.
- A fixed base size of 1474 bytes for all non-vCPU content.

Thank for detailed analyses and info.


Based on that I would propose the following formula with the justification:

/*
   * The size is calculated from a fixed baseline plus a scalable
   * portion for each potential vCPU node up to the system limit
   * (MAX_VIRT_CPUS), as the vCPU nodes are the primary consumer
   * of space.
   *
   * The baseline of 2KiB is a safe buffer for all non-vCPU FDT
   * content. The 128 bytes per vCPU is derived from a worst-case
   * analysis of the FDT construction-time size for a single
   * vCPU node.
   */
#define DOMU_DTB_SIZE (2048 + (MAX_VIRT_CPUS * 128))

**********************************************

Please tell me would you be happy with that?

It looks ok. One thing I worry about - should it be Xen page aligned?

--
Best regards,
-grygorii


Reply via email to