Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 03/12/25 1:50 PM, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> On 28/11/2025 14:55, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>>> + * in_lazy_mmu_mode() can be used to check whether the lazy MMU mode is
>>> + * currently enabled.
>> The in_lazy_mmu_mode() name looks ambiguous to me. When the lazy MMU mode
>> is paused are we still in lazy MMU mode? The __task_lazy_mmu_mode_active()
>> implementation suggests we are not, while one could still assume we are,
>> just paused.
>>
>> Should in_lazy_mmu_mode() be named e.g. as in_active_lazy_mmu_mode() such
>> a confusion would not occur in the first place.
> 
> I see your point, how about is_lazy_mmu_mode_active()?

Agreed - is_lazy_mmu_mode_active() seems better.