* Jürgen Groß <[email protected]> wrote:
> > CPUs anymore. Should it cause any regressions, it's easy to bisect to.
> > There's been enough changes around all these facilities that the
> > original timings are probably way off already, so we've just been
> > cargo-cult porting these to newer kernels essentially.
>
> Fine with me.
>
> Which path to removal of io_delay would you (and others) prefer?
>
> 1. Ripping it out immediately.
I'd just rip it out immediately, and see who complains. :-)
Whatever side effects it still may have, I very strongly doubt it has
anything to do with the original purpose of IO delays...
> In cases 2-4 I'd still like to have patch 1 of my series applied, as it will
> make paravirt rework easier.
Sure.
Thanks,
Ingo
