On 2/3/26 6:02 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.01.2026 17:47, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/riscv/sbi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/sbi.c
@@ -249,6 +249,38 @@ static int (* __ro_after_init sbi_rfence)(unsigned long
fid,
unsigned long arg4,
unsigned long arg5);
+static int cf_check sbi_set_timer_v02(uint64_t stime_value)
+{
+ struct sbiret ret;
+
+ ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_TIME, SBI_EXT_TIME_SET_TIMER, stime_value,
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_32
+ stime_value >> 32,
+#else
+ 0,
+#endif
+ 0, 0, 0, 0);
+
+ return sbi_err_map_xen_errno(ret.error);
+}
+
+static int cf_check sbi_set_timer_v01(uint64_t stime_value)
+{
+ struct sbiret ret;
+
+ ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER, 0, stime_value,
From this name I'm judging version 0.1 is meant. How does this fit with ...
@@ -326,6 +358,14 @@ int __init sbi_init(void)
sbi_rfence = sbi_rfence_v02;
printk("SBI v0.2 RFENCE extension detected\n");
}
+
+ if ( sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_TIME) > 0 )
+ {
+ sbi_set_timer = sbi_set_timer_v02;
+ printk("SBI v0.2 TIME extension detected\n");
+ }
+ else
+ sbi_set_timer = sbi_set_timer_v01;
}
else
panic("Ooops. SBI spec version 0.1 detected. Need to add support");
... the panic() here?
panic() is still here as then we will want to add support for rfence v01 SBI
call
too what hasn't been done yet.
Could it be an option to change panic to:
sbi_set_timer = sbi_set_timer_v01;
dprintk("SBI v0.1 isn't fully supported\n");
and then add sbi_rfence = sbi_rfence_v01 when i will be first used?
~ Oleksii
