>>> On 31.07.18 at 13:56, <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, <aisa...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c
>> @@ -349,6 +349,18 @@ int vmce_wrmsr(uint32_t msr, uint64_t val)
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt_one(struct vcpu *v, hvm_domain_context_t *h)
> 
> Afaict v can be pointer to const.

Hmm, I guess rather not, or else you'd have to undo that in
patch 8 or 9 or so.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to